top of page
C A R T E R D I C K E N S
L A W Y E R S
HOME
SERVICES
Fixed Fee Services
Children & Family Law
Property & Family Law
Criminal Law
Traffic Law
Restraining Orders
Digital Asset Law
Probate & Intestacy
Wills & Estates
Estate Litigation
Mortgage Guarantee Advice
BLOG
CONTACT US
VIDEOS
THE TEAM
Ben
Jarrod
Rachel
Dimitri
Jess
Jack
Thomas
Tammy
Chelsea
More
Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
All Videos
All Categories
Play Video
Play Video
07:37
Restraining Orders in Western Australia
In Western Australia, restraining orders are vital for protecting individuals from abuse and violence. Since the Family Violence Restraining Order (FVRO) was introduced on 1 July 2017, clear guidelines have been established for those seeking protection from family-related violence. Governed by the Restraining Orders Act 1997 (WA), FVROs are designed to safeguard those experiencing abuse from family members or close personal relationships. The Act outlines three types of restraining orders: FVROs, Violence Restraining Orders (VROs), and Misconduct Restraining Orders (MROs). FVROs are for domestic or intimate relationships, including spouses, de-facto partners, ex-partners, and family connections. For children, applications can be brought by a parent, guardian, or welfare officer. VROs and MROs cater to non-family situations like colleagues or neighbors, addressing serious violence or public disturbances. Obtaining a restraining order involves a court process where a Magistrate issues the order after a hearing. Applicants must demonstrate past or likely future acts of violence or a reasonable fear of such. Interim FVROs can provide immediate, temporary protection without notifying the other party, ensuring safety and confidentiality during legal proceedings. Legal Aid offers detailed guidance on obtaining interim FVROs. The Restraining Orders Act defines "Family Violence" and "Personal Violence" broadly to include behaviors like physical assault, sexual abuse, stalking, verbal abuse, property damage, financial abuse, and more. This inclusive definition aims to protect individuals from diverse forms of harm within familial relationships. Breaching a restraining order is a serious offense with penalties including fines and imprisonment. Legal proceedings vary for children and adults, and aggravating factors like exposing children to violence influence sentencing. Recidivism is addressed with mandatory penalties for repeat offenders unless deemed clearly unjust by the court. The Restraining Orders Act 1997 (WA) provides comprehensive legal protection for victims of family and personal violence, emphasizing immediate and long-term safeguards through interim and final FVROs, substantial penalties for breaches, and an inclusive definition of violence to ensure extensive protection for victims.
Play Video
Play Video
06:12
From Family Court to Prison
In this video, we delve into the realities of Family Court proceedings in Western Australia, highlighting two significant cases: Garcon and Garcon [2022] FCWA 240 and Molloy and Foust [2020] FCWAM 66. In the Garcon case, Mr. Garcon faced contempt charges for persistently violating court orders concerning contact with his children. Despite orders for supervised visits due to allegations of abuse and concerns for the children's safety, Mr. Garcon repeatedly breached these directives, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the court's authority. This culminated in a 14-day imprisonment sentence, emphasizing the severe consequences of defying court orders, particularly in matters involving family violence and child welfare. Similarly, the Molloy and Foust case revolved around Mr. Foust's deliberate attempts to undermine the court's authority in a property settlement dispute. By selling a jointly owned property against court orders and concocting elaborate lies to cover his tracks, Mr. Foust not only financially disadvantaged his ex-wife but also showed a calculated effort to deceive the court. His actions led to an 18-month imprisonment, underscoring the court's commitment to upholding justice and deterring such deceitful behavior. These cases illustrate that while imprisonment for contempt in Family Court is rare, it is a crucial measure to ensure compliance and protect the integrity of the legal process. Join us as we explore the complexities of these cases and the important lessons they impart about respecting court authority and the serious repercussions of contempt in the Family Court system.
Play Video
Play Video
07:52
Family Law Disputes and Mediation
This video takes you through the necessary steps to give you the best chance of success when attempting mediation for a family law property dispute in Australia. This includes exchanging disclosure, discussing the asset pool, obtaining legal advice, discussing the relevant factors and attending mediation.
Play Video
Play Video
12:01
Sentencing in Western Australia
This educational video dives deep into the intricate process by which criminal courts in Western Australia determine sentences for offenders. Understanding the sentencing procedure is crucial for anyone studying or involved in the legal system, and this video aims to demystify the complexities involved. It begins by exploring the foundational laws governing sentencing in the region, emphasizing the Sentencing Act of Western Australia, which outlines the principles and factors courts must consider. Recognizing that each case is unique, the video illustrates how judges weigh the specific facts of a case, including the nature of the offense, the offender's background, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances that might influence the sentence. A significant portion of the video is dedicated to discussing the role of case law in sentencing decisions. This comprehensive overview is designed to be accessible to a wide audience, from law students and professionals to anyone interested in the workings of the criminal justice system. By the end of the video, viewers will have a solid understanding of the multifaceted approach taken by Western Australian courts in sentencing offenders, underpinned by a delicate balance of statutory guidelines and the nuanced interpretation of case law.
bottom of page